Reno Council Member Proposes Game-Changing ADU Policy—Here’s What It Means for Homeowners

Could Relaxed ADU Rules Transform Reno’s Housing Crisis?

Reno City Council member Naomi Duerr is pushing a bold proposal to ease restrictions on Accessory Dwelling Units (ADUs), sparking heated debate among residents. If approved, the changes could unlock new housing opportunities—but not everyone is on board.

Key Changes in the Proposal:

• No More Owner-Occupancy Requirements: Property owners could rent out both main homes and ADUs without living onsite.
• Size Limits Increased: ADUs up to 800 sq ft would be allowed, compared to the current 500 sq ft cap.
• Faster Permitting: A streamlined approval process could cut wait times by 30-60 days.

Why This Matters Now

With Reno’s median home price hovering near $550,000, advocates argue ADUs offer critical "missing middle" housing. "This isn’t about developer profits—it’s about letting families create intergenerational homes or supplemental income," Duerr told BNN.

"We’re seeing seniors forced out of neighborhoods they’ve lived in for decades. ADUs let them age in place while adding inventory." — Housing activist Mark Johnson

The Opposition’s Concerns

1. Parking Woes: Critics warn relaxed rules could overwhelm street parking in historic districts.
2. Short-Term Rental Fears: Some worry investors will convert ADUs into unregulated Airbnbs.
3. Infrastructure Strain: Older neighborhoods may lack sewer capacity for denser housing.

What Happens Next?

The Planning Commission will review the proposal on May 14, with a council vote expected by mid-June. If passed, Reno would join California cities like Sacramento that eliminated owner-occupancy rules in 2023.

What Do You Think?

• Should cities prioritize housing density over neighborhood character?
• Is it fair to let investors buy properties just to build ADUs for profit?
• Could this policy accidentally accelerate gentrification in working-class areas?
• Would you rent an ADU to a family member—or a complete stranger?