Ohio EPA Gives East Akron More Time: Will Alterra Energy’s Permit Face Public Backlash?

Extended Public Comment Period Sparks Debate Over Waste-to-Energy Proposal

The Ohio Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has extended the public comment period for Alterra Energy’s proposed waste-to-energy facility in East Akron, giving residents and stakeholders more time to weigh in. The decision comes amid growing scrutiny over the environmental and health impacts of such facilities in urban areas.

Why the Extension Matters

The original 30-day comment window, set to expire soon, has been pushed back by two weeks due to:

• Community Concerns: Local groups demanded more time to review the permit’s technical details.
• Environmental Questions: Critics argue the plant’s emissions could harm air quality in East Akron.
• Economic Trade-offs: Proponents claim the facility will create jobs, but opponents fear long-term health costs.

What’s in the Permit?

Alterra’s permit application outlines plans to convert non-recyclable plastics into synthetic fuels. Key points include:

1. Emissions controls for volatile organic compounds (VOCs) and particulate matter.
2. A 24/7 monitoring system to comply with Ohio EPA standards.
3. Traffic impact assessments for increased truck deliveries.

Voices from the Community

East Akron residents are split:

• Supporters: Highlight the potential for 60+ jobs and reduced landfill waste.
• Opponents: Cite studies linking similar plants to respiratory issues in nearby neighborhoods.

Next Steps

The Ohio EPA will review all comments before finalizing the permit. A public hearing is expected in late October.

What Do You Think?

• Should waste-to-energy plants be built in residential areas, or is the risk too high?
• Are job creation and waste reduction worth potential health trade-offs?
• Could Ohio’s push for alternative energy overshadow environmental justice concerns?
• Should the EPA have veto power over projects in low-income communities?