- 6/20/2025 7:09:37 PM
Loading
Have you ever pondered the implications of having a local voice in Congress representing our values—or the risk of electing a conservative Republican who might oppose them?
Back in 1966, as a young University of Oregon student, I threw myself into the campaign for Progressive Democratic candidate Charles O. Porter. His mission? To be a beacon for peace during the tumultuous Vietnam War era. Despite our efforts, Porter lost to Republican John Dellenback, who spent eight years supporting endless war appropriations and escalating conflict.
Fast forward to today, and it feels like history is repeating itself. In a recent advertisement featured in the Roseburg News-Review, Monique DeSpain, a Republican candidate, boldly stated, “I’m Monique DeSpain, a Republican running to end 50 years of failed, self-serving career politicians representing the 4th District of Oregon.”
But what does DeSpain mean when she refers to the legacy of Congressman Peter DeFazio and his predecessor Jim Weaver as “failed” and “self-serving”? DeFazio dedicated 36 years to serving the people of Oregon, earning national respect and delivering hundreds of millions of dollars for essential projects across southwest Oregon. His contributions to infrastructure and local communities are undeniable.
Jim Weaver, who served from 1975 to 1987, was also a committed public servant. His efforts led to significant environmental protections, including the addition of French Pete to the Three Sisters Wilderness Act and support for the Oregon Wilderness Act of 1984.
Monique DeSpain’s qualifications, however, raise some red flags. She lacks experience in the legislative process and has no record of community service on local boards or commissions. Furthermore, she claims to be pro-choice, yet her approval of the overturning of Roe v. Wade and her affiliation with the ultra-right-wing Oregon Constitution Party suggest otherwise. This party’s agenda often aligns with extremist views that many might find alarming.
Yes, DeSpain is correct—voters do deserve transparency regarding her real agenda. But is it one we can support?
As we approach the upcoming election, it’s crucial to reflect on the implications of our choices. Will we prioritize experience and a proven track record of service, or will we gamble on a candidate who may not align with our community’s values?
Comments
Leave a Reply