Your City, Your Decision: See How Your Neighbors Voted

Minnesota Lawmakers Set Stage for High-Stakes 2025 Ballot Questions

With the 2025 legislative session on the horizon, political leaders in Minnesota are preparing to advance a series of significant constitutional amendments for voter consideration. The forthcoming debates are expected to be contentious, focusing on two primary issues: transportation funding and the structure of state government.

A Potential Showdown Over Transportation Taxes

A key proposal expected to dominate discussions involves a "lockbox" amendment for transportation funds. This measure would constitutionally dedicate revenue from automotive-related taxes, such as those from parts, repairs, and vehicle sales, exclusively to transportation projects. Proponents argue this would prevent these funds from being diverted to other areas of the state budget, ensuring a consistent investment in roads, bridges, and transit systems.

Opponents, however, caution that such an amendment would severely limit legislative flexibility. They contend that during economic downturns or unexpected budgetary shortfalls, the inability to use these revenues for other critical needs, like education or public health, could force damaging cuts elsewhere.

Debating the State Auditor's Role

Another point of debate centers on the future of the State Auditor's office. Some legislators are advocating for a change to make the position an appointed one, rather than an elected post filled by popular vote. Supporters of this change believe it would professionalize the office, allowing for the appointment of an individual with specific, non-partisan auditing expertise.

Critics of the proposal frame it as a power grab that would disenfranchise voters. They argue that removing the public's ability to elect the State Auditor reduces transparency and accountability, as the official would be beholden to the legislature or governor instead of the electorate.

The Path to the Ballot

For any of these proposals to reach the 2025 ballot, they must first achieve a simple majority vote in both the Minnesota House and Senate. Given the politically divided nature of the state government, the success of any amendment is far from guaranteed. The coming legislative session is shaping up to be a critical period of negotiation and political maneuvering.

If placed on the ballot, these questions would join what is already anticipated to be a busy election cycle, drawing significant attention and campaign spending from various interest groups across the political spectrum.

What do you think?

• Should tax revenue from car repairs and sales be constitutionally protected for transportation, or does that unfairly tie the hands of lawmakers during a budget crisis?


• Is making the State Auditor an appointed position a move toward professional efficiency, or a dangerous step that removes a crucial check on government power?


• Do you trust your fellow voters to elect a qualified State Auditor, or should that be left to experts selected by officials?